As you may have seen in some of my other posts, I (as the owner of Matraex, Inc) am not allowed by Vietnam statute to be the Chief RO of the entity in Vietnam, however I must have a Chief RO
Some of the factors to consider.
- The Chief RO, must be present to pickup the seal. When they pick it up, they must sign the official papers and registers to start the entity. As they are signing they actually must use the stamp as well to stamp next to their signature on the official records at the Police headquarters.
- The Chief RO must make a decent wage. When I wanted to add the responsibility of being the Chief RO to my wife's monthly responsibilities, the added duties were not much. Review the books monthly, perform any signatures as directed by the company through corporate resolution. These requirements would be minimal and would require at most 5 to 10 hours per month. So I suggested that I would increase her yearly wage by $5000 for the added responsibilities. It turned out that our Vietnam attorney thought that idea would not pass scrutiny by the Hanoi Authority. They suggested an income of $2000 / month and they indicated that this would be one of the lowest incomes of any of the Representative Office companies already in Hanoi.
- The Chief RO must be the one to sign official contracts in Vietnam. As a Representative Office in Hanoi, our company will not be allowed to make agreements between the Hanoi entity and another Vietnam entity, the Vietname Representative Office is not recognized as its own entity. Instead Matraex must make the agreement between Matraex headquarters and any other company in Hanoi. However, in at least one case we found that a Vietnamese company was only willing to accept a signature from the Chief RO on a contract. It appears that this is because the Chief RO is the only 'localized' signature that is allowed to represent the company in vietnam. This makes sense because we had to legalize the Chief RO's passport and submit it with the application. Even though I am the president of the company they are making an agreement with. the only locally recognized agent, with a legal local signature, is the Chief RO.
- Because of the last point, the Chief RO of the company holds all of the power of the company; it will likely be worth while to investigate a way that I might be able to register myself (the president) as a locally approved agent of the company. However in the mean time, you must have ultimate trust in the Chief RO.
- The way that I decided to get my Representative Office started in Hanoi, coincided with an education trip to Hanoi, so my Chief RO was a trusted school class mate. However this meant that I had to file a change to the Chief RO soon after to the long term RO. This meant that while I was in Hanoi the first time, I had to either
- prepare my interim Chief RO to sign agreements as the temporary stand in or
- wait until the Change of Chief RO was processed.
- Changing the Chief RO does not take cost any money with the Hanoi Authority and the form to do it is online here.
- http://english.hanoi.gov.vn/documents/10180/30802/845.doc?version=1.0
- The form allows for many changes however it indicates some complexities for changing the Chief RO, which imply some items which need consideration when selecting a Chief RO.
- The amount of PIT (Personal Income Tax) that was paid by the previous Chief RO. The form also requires a certification that the PIT was paid.
- A reason that the Chief RO is being changed is required - so basically the decision to change the Chief RO will be scrutinized and it should not be taken lightly.
- The company office location change form is included with the template to change the Chief RO, which indicates that it may be somewhat common for the ChiefRO and the address to change at the same time
- When changing the Chief RO, I have to certify that the previous person filed and paid all PIT. This issue somewhat explains why it was important to make a larger salary for the Chief RO. Because this may allow the government to collect a higher tax on the salary. I am not positive whether there will be a requirement for the payment to the Chief RO to be made subject to Vietnam payroll taxes and roles. However because of this, an important factor to consider when selecting a Chief RO, is whether to select a local, or an ExPat. In the case that an ExPat is selected, then a whole slew of tax relates issues becomes an issue.
- Is the Chief RO allowed to collect the income in the US since the though the services are all performed from the US?
- If the taxes must be paid to the Hanoi Authority, are taxes paid in Vietnam retaxable in the US?
- How does the company account for and report salary paid to the same individual using two different methods and tax rates.
- Each of these issues potentially creates complexity for the company that selecting a local may not.